A Representative Photo
By A Report by The Times of India
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Given that the law of the land – notably Child Marriage Prohibition Act, 2006, and Special Marriage Act, 1954 — is clear and forthright on the subject of underage marriage, the government’s June 14 circular, which tried to justify underage marriages under special circumstances, based its legality on the Muslim Marriage Act, 1957.
The truth is there is nothing called Muslim Marriage Act, 1957. It does not exist, it’s a fiction created by irresponsible bureaucrats in Kerala’s Local Self Government (LSG) department. Worse, the state government’s law department and, indeed, the larger legal fraternity in the state, either failed to detect the deception or chose to ignore it.
“Indian Parliament has never enacted such an act called Muslim Marriage Act 1957,” said legal scholar Dr Sheena Shukkoor, pro vice chancellor of MG University and former faculty of National Judicial Academy.
The controversial circular which directed registrars in local bodies to register marriages between Muslim girls aged below 18 (above 16) and boys below 21 set the minimum age for marriage as above 16 years invoking provisions of the fictitious Muslim Marriage Act, 1957. According to Advocate Seena Rajagopal, member of Child Welfare Committee, issuing such a circular based on a blatant lie was equivalent to encouraging marriage registrars to commit a crime.
Law secretary C P Ramaraja Prema Prasad confirmed that Muslim Marriage Act 1957doesn’t exist. ”Such a law is available on the internet. It’s not in practice in India. We had to incorporate the accepted principles being followed in certain Muslim nations since Muslim laws are not codified in India’,” he said.
He also tried to pass the buck by saying that the circular was issued by LSG department. On his part, James Varghese, LSG principal secretary, who signed the June 14 circular, clarified that the circular was issued as per the directive of the law department. ” We issued the circular only after getting it clarified from the law department. We believe that the law department had properly analysed all legal aspects before the issuance of the circular,” he said.
A Google search revealed that the Act quoted for the controversial circular is available on a French website called JaFBase, a database of international conventions and texts of substantive law largely applicable in French courts.
In the Muslim community, matters regarding special property of females, including personal property inherited or obtained under contract or gift or any other provision of personal law, marriage and dissolution of marriage come under the ambit of Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937. Two other acts, formulated later — Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939, and Muslim Women [protection of rights on divorce] Act, 1986 – complement the Shariat Act.
These are the situations where Right To information act 2005 be used and when confirmed information is Received .It becomes a stamped document and can be used to confront the pseudo’s.
In Uttar pradesh an RTI Activist Urmila did a similar exercise on Sri Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and she Received Information in writting that nowhere the GOI or Parliament had coined the title “Father of the Nation”
Intersting and revealing is it not ?